Timothy C. Hain, MD. Tinnitus Page Page last modified: October 19, 2016
|Structures of the ear. Most tinnitus is due to damage to the cochlea (#9 above)|
This is a congenital anomaly in which the internal carotid can present as a middle ear mass. If the carotid fails to develop correctly during fetal life, the inferior tympanic artery enlarges to take it's place. It enters the skull through it's own foramen, courses through the medial part of the middle ear, and then rejoins the petrous ICA (Branstetter and Weissman, 2006).
Dehiscent internal carotid.
The ICA may not have a bony covering as it courses through the middle ear.
Stenosed internal carotid
A bruit from a narrowed IC may cause tinnitus.
Some authors claim that branches of the AICA may abut the 8th nerve and cause tinnitus. We find this idea dubious.
Dural Arteriovenous fistulae (DAVF) cause loud noises, synchronous with the pulse, that can often be heard by others with a stethoscope, or sometimes by simply putting one's ear next to the person's head. DAVF receive blood through meningeal arteries or meningeal branches of cerebral arteries and drain directly through a dural sinus or venous channel tributary of a venous sinus through dilated deep veins (Signorelli et al, 2014). DAVF are thought to be acquired and are associated with intracranial surgery, ear infection, tumor, hypercoagulability, puerperium, and trauma. (Adamczyk et al, 2012).
DAVF are classified through several systems. The Cognard states that type I and II DAVFs drain directly into dural sinuses, the difference being antegrade flow in the type I, and retrograde flow in the type II. Types III and IV drain directly into the cortical veins, without dural venous drainage. Type V drains into perimedulary veins. The antegrade flow types are thought to be more benign, while retrograde is thought to be a more "aggressive" course with more likelihood of hemmorage. The risk of hemmorage increases with direct drainage into cortical veins (Signorelli et al, 2014).
Diagnosis generally includes CT or MRI imaging. The type II have more severe findings, while the type I can even have normal imaging. According to De Keukeleire et al (2011), Type I DAVs are low risk and need be treated only if symptoms are intolerable.
To be certain there is no DAVF at all, 6 vessel DSA is suggested by the interventional radiologists. Of course, this entails risk of stroke from the procedure itself. Signs of venous congestion are seen in about 80% of the "malignant" DAVF's, and only 8% of the type I DAVFs. (Signorelli et al, 2014).
DAVF can often be embolized. Generally speaking this may be with glue such as Onyx or nBCA (Puffer et al, 2012), with or without stents or balloons. Successful treatment requires occlusion of the venous recipient, as occlusion of the arteries alone can be associated with recruitment of more venous drainage (Adamczyk et al, 2012). Embolization is most often done through the arterial circulation. There are risks of stroke due to occlusion of blood vessels supplying normal brain. Trans venous embolization is a good option when arterial feeders are too numerous, and when the venous drainage of the DAVF can be sacrificed. There are risks here of venous infarction or hemorrhage
Surgery can be used when embolization fails, is not feasible or is incomplete. Surgery is sometimes preferred for fistulae draining into the superior sagittal or dominant transverse sinus when embolization might result in an undesirable sacrifice of the dural venous sinus. In the late 1970's and 1980's, surgery was the primary treatment.
Radiosurgery is mainly reserved for cases that persist after embolization, but some authors use the opposite order -- radiosurgery first, followed by a clean up embolization (e.g. Friedman et al, 2001). The reason for this order is that embolization might obscure the target for the radiosurgery if performed first. Radiosurgery by itself has a low success rate as the only treatment (Signorellli et al, 2014). It is also a poor choice for those with hemorrhage, because it is slow acting (1-3 years), and more hemorrhage might occur while waiting for the blood vessels to close. On the other hand, radiosurgery is likely a more durable long term treatment than embolization alone.
Recurrence of fistulae may appear, possibly due to release of growth factors associated with local tissue hypoxia, following occlusion of the DAVF.
Extra caution is needed when the fistula is in the posterior circulation (i.e. fed by the vertebral artery), as it is difficult to thread a catheter through these tiny arteries. It is easy to cause a "vertebral dissection", possibly accompanied by a stroke.
It may seem silly to say this, but in our opinion, it is generally not worth taking on a significant risk of having a stroke to attempt to get rid of a noise in one's head with embolization. The US health care system pays interventional radiologists very well to do embolization, and of course, they have motivation to improve people's lives through their training. Nevertheless, the decision whether to go forward with a dangerous procedure should be made by the patient's treating physician, rather than by a radiologist. Decisions about life-threatening procedures should not be made by the radiologist who may be well trained to thread a catheter into a patient's head, but has no long term relationship with the patient, and also generally has had no clinical training in otolaryngology or neurology. We suggest getting a 2nd opinion from a non-radiologist expert before proceeding with embolization for tinnitus. To avoid conflicts of interest, ideally the expert should work for another medical institution.
|AV fistula associated with pulsatile tinnitus. Courtesy of Dr. Marcello Cherchi.||Dural AV fistula of the transverse sinus associated with pulsatile tinnitus. Courtesy of Dr. Dario Yacovino.|
This subject is discussed on a separate page.